Loading…
Welcome to the EARLI SIG 20 and SIG 26 Conference
arrow_back View All Dates
Thursday, October 11
 

8:30am IDT

[Paper Session 13] Assessing student’s ability to control variables: The impact of test format and sub-skills Mandel 530Martin Schwichow [Paper Session 13] Automatically Assessing Scientific Explanations in Online Inquiry Mandel 530Haiying Li • Rachel Dickler • Janice Gobert [Paper Session 13] False Positives and False Negatives in Inquiry Assessment: Investigating Log and Open Response Data Mandel 530Rachel Dickler • Janice Gobert • Haiying Li [Paper Session 13] Primary School Inquiry Skills Assessment (PSISA) Test Mandel 530Margus Pedaste • Aleksander Baucal • Meelis Brikker • Elle Reisenbuk [Paper Session 14] Citizen Science in Schools: Building Mutually-Beneficial Partnerships Between Schools and Scientists Rabin 2001Osnat Atias • Ayelet Baram-Tsabari • Maya Benichou • Yael Kali • Rachel Levin- Peled • Ornit Sagy [Paper Session 14] How to develop critical inquiry reasoning? Evidence-based educational research at primary school Rabin 2001Calliste Scheibling • Pasquinelli Elena • Sander Emmanuel [Paper Session 14] Online Inquiry profiles among six-graders- how do they search and write from multiple sources? Rabin 2001Mirjamaija Mikkila-Erdmann • Eero Sormunen • Marja Vauras [Paper Session 14] Promoting Inquiry Learning in Elementary School Children Rabin 2001Julia Schiefer • Jessika Golle • Kerstin Oschatz • Ulrich Trautwein [Paper Session 15] Desirable and Undesirable Disagreements: Jewish Women Studying the Talmudic Texts Rabin 3001Esty Teomim-Ben Menachem [Paper Session 15] Learning by Arguing Rabin 3001Kalypso Iordanou • Laura Hemberger • Deanna Kuhn • Yuchen Shi [Paper Session 15] To argue or not to argue? Influencing factors of student´s participation in classroom discussions Rabin 3001Dorothee Gronostay • Sabine Manzel [Paper Session 15] “I’m Not Disagreeing...I’m Just Saying”: Supporting Authentic Argumentation in Science Classrooms Rabin 3001Aliza Zivic • Brian J. Reiser -Symposium 7: Bridging Dialogue, Inquiry and Argumentation: A Necessary Synergy for 21st Century Education Mandel AuditoriumChrysi Rapanta • Maria Evagorou • Mark Felton • Fiona Maine • Discussant: Michael Baker Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Through the Discussion of Socio-Scientific Issues?[Symposium 7] Mandel AuditoriumMaria Evagorou Dialogue as a Central Concept in the Promotion of Cultural Literacy[Symposium 7] Mandel AuditoriumFiona Maine Towards Defining the Effectiveness of Classroom-based Dialogue[Symposium 7] Mandel AuditoriumMark Felton

10:30am IDT

1:00pm IDT

[Paper Session 16] Explaining Expert Disagreement Adaptively Rabin 2001Eva Thomm • Sarit Barzilai • Rainer Bromme [Paper Session 16] Prompts to foster critical thinking in a laboratory undergraduate course Rabin 2001Lilian Danial • Jenna Koenen • Rüdiger Tiemann [Paper Session 17] Culture, social change, formal education, and shifts in epistemic perspective Mandel 530Michael Weinstock • Turky Abu Aleon • Patricia Greenfield • Adriana Manago [Paper Session 17] Informal Reasoning on Energy Resource Distribution through Socioscientific Pedagogy Mandel 530Hagit Shasha-Sharf • Tali Tal [Paper Session 17] Resolving ambiguity during anatomical identification work Mandel 530Victor Lee • Ilana Dubovi [Paper Session 17] Some Reasons for Considering Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation as a Set of Cross-Domain Skills Mandel 530Frank Fischer • Katharina Engelmann • Andreas Hetmanek • Ansgar Opitz -Symposium 8: Promoting scientific argumentation and learning with competing models and contradictory evidence Rabin 3001Ravit Duncan • Christa Asterhan • Veronica Cavera • Anat Yarden • Discussant: Clark Chinn Learning using contradictory texts promotes students' critical thinking[Symposium 8] Rabin 3001Anat Yarden • Moriah Ariely Refutation Text and Argumentation to Promote Conceptual Change on the topic of Natural Selection[Symposium 8] Rabin 3001Christa Asterhan • Christa Asterhan Refutational Strategies in Arguments about Competing Mechanistic Models of a Genetic Phenomenon[Symposium 8] Rabin 3001Veronica Cavera • Ravit Duncan -Symposium 9: The role of argumentation in schools towards the constitution of deliberative democracy Mandel AuditoriumMichael Baker • Edan Blon • Adar Cohen • Benzi Slakmon • Discussant: Aviv Cohen Heated discussions in small group political education strand[Symposium 9] Mandel AuditoriumBenzi Slakmon Rhetoric as a tool for education[Symposium 9] Mandel AuditoriumEdan Blon Walking on a Tightrope: Controversy Work of Civic Teachers – The Israeli Case[Symposium 9] Mandel AuditoriumAdar Cohen

3:00pm IDT

[Paper Session 18] Exploring students’ performance in a SRL-supported, scientific inquiry, i-STEM learning environment. Rabin 2001Marion Crauwels • Daan Moechars • Tim Ramaekers • Carla Schramme • Geert Van De Water [Paper Session 18] Self-Learning Dispositions as Reflected During Research Apprenticeship Program Rabin 2001Merchi Edry • Irit Sason • Dori Yehudit [Paper Session 18] Situational interest trajectories within and across domains in inquiry-based science education Rabin 2001Tomi Jaakkola • Margus Pedaste Characteristics of argumentative thinking among of Haredi students Rabin 3001Ehud Tsemach • Anat Zohar Connections between cognitive demand of task, students' struggle and explicit attention to concepts Rabin 3001Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim • Talli Nachlieli • Merav Weingarden Exploring the use of the Three Domains for Dialogue framework for designing and interrogating TPD Rabin 3001MARIA ELISA Calcagni Garcia • Leonardo Lago Haredi computer-science students: how does their unique background influence their academic studies? Rabin 3001Yifat Ben-David Kolikant • Sarah Genut Measuring teacher educators’ knowledge, beliefs & attitudes toward evidence-based teaching practices Rabin 3001Despoina Georgiou • Frank Fischer • Sog Yee Mok • Tina Seidel Non Ionizing Radiation on Facebook: Discussion Patterns on Social Media Rabin 3001Keren Dalyot • Ayelet Baram-Tsabari Readiness of students as future school teachers for professional activity Rabin 3001Nataliia Demeshkant • Karolina Czerwiec • Ludmila Dankevych • Katarzyna Potyrala Regularities in the Long-Term Mathematical Student Projects Rabin 3001Alik Palatnik Supporting Student Efforts to Frame (and Pursue) Academically Substantive Inquiries Rabin 3001Susan Mayer Teacher frameworks in dialogic science discussions Rabin 3001Sherice Clark • Katherine Garcia • Jessica Miguel • Ramon Stephens • Melissa Warstadt Teacher views on inquiry learning: The contribution of diverse experiences in outdoor environment Rabin 3001Rachel Levin- Peled • Keren Levy • Tali Tal Teachers’ attitudes towards students' creativity and using educational interactive tools Rabin 3001Karolina Czerwiec • Katarzyna Potyrala • Wioletta Skrzypek • Emanuel Studnicki The becoming teacher's identity contradiction in the professional construction Rabin 3001Danping Peng • Iva Koribská Using YouTube as a Dialogic Space for Pre-Service Teachers' Course on CSCL Rabin 3001Rotem Abdu Whose mandate is it? Science teachers' thoughts of SSI implementation in science classrooms. Rabin 3001Emil Eidin • Yael Shwartz -Symposium 10: Reconciling Construction and Critique in Argument Instruction Mandel 530Flora Matos • Bryan Henderson • Gabriel Macedo • Discussant: Antonia Larrain Collaborative Writing as a Bridge between Dialogic and Individual Argumentation[Symposium 10] (remote presentation) Mandel 530Flora Matos • Deanna Kuhn Oral and Written Assessments to Distinguish Construction/Co-Construction and Critique[Symposium 10] Mandel 530Bryan Henderson • Earl Aguilera • April Holton • Nicole Zillmer Students’ Developmental Pathways: Internalization of Argumentative Semiotic Regulators[Symposium 10] Mandel 530Gabriel Macedo • Nancy Ramírez -Symposium 11: The interactive circulation of affect in educational situations: multi-disciplinary perspectives Mandel AuditoriumMichael Baker • Piia Naykki • Christian Plantin • Benzi Slakmon • Discussant: Michael Baker Emotions in Language and Interactions: A Memo[Symposium 11] Mandel AuditoriumChristian Plantin The Educational Goal of Cultivating Emotions in Democracy[Symposium 11] Mandel AuditoriumBenzi Slakmon Thinking and talking about emotions. Challenges & emotion regulation in collaborative learning[Symposium 11] Mandel AuditoriumPiia Naykki • Jaana Isohätälä • Sanna Järvelä • Hanna Jarvenoja
 


Filter sessions
Apply filters to sessions.
Filtered by Date - 
  • ICT Demo Session [SIG 20]
  • Keynote [SIG20]
  • Keynote [SIG26]
  • Paper Session [SIG 20]
  • Paper Session [SIG 26]
  • Poster Session I [SIG 20 and SIG 26]
  • Poster Session II [SIG 20 and SIG 26]
  • Public Debate [SIG 26]
  • Symposium 01: Student Learning and Epistemic Progress in Dialogic Teaching I
  • Symposium 02: Looking Back and Moving Forward: Synthesize Best Evidence from Learning and Instruction Research
  • Symposium 03: Learning to Argue from Evidence
  • Symposium 04: Social- Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Collaborative Teacher Inquiry
  • Symposium 05: Dialogic interpretative practices and their contribution to continuity/change in religious education
  • Symposium 06: Dialogic pedgogy in conventional schools
  • Symposium 07: Bridging Dialogue- Inquiry and Argumentation: A Necessary Synergy for 21st Century Education
  • Symposium 08: Promoting scientific argumentation and learning with competing models and contradictory evidence
  • Symposium 09: The role of argumentation in schools towards the constitution of deliberative democracy
  • Symposium 10: Reconciling Construction and Critique in Argument Instruction
  • Symposium 11: The interactive circulation of affect in educational situations: multi-disciplinary perspectives
  • Symposium 12: Evidence-Based Reasoning for Decisions in the Classroom: Teachers-Trainees and Teacher Trainers
  • Symposium 13: Student Learning and Epistemic Progress in Dialogic Teaching II
  • Symposium 14: Argumentation-emotion & scripting: learning sciences and interactive narrative design
  • Welcome
  • Company
  • SIG 20
  • SIG 26
  • Audience
  • adaptive systems
  • adult education
  • agent-based learning
  • and argumentation in multicultural contexts
  • arguing to learn
  • argumentation and epistemological beliefes
  • argumentation and transfer
  • argumentation in and across domains
  • assessment techniques for inquiry learning
  • case study
  • collaborative learning
  • collective reasoning
  • computer science
  • computer-supported learning
  • design based research
  • dialogic education
  • dialogue
  • dialogue and resoning (crossover paper)
  • discovery-based learning
  • ethnographic research
  • evaluation
  • experimental study
  • fallacies and fake news
  • field study
  • game-based learning
  • higher education
  • historical reasoning
  • history
  • inquiry and argumentation
  • inquiry learning
  • inquiry learning / argumentation
  • inquiry learning in multiple domains
  • intelligent tutoring / assessment systems
  • knowledge building
  • large scale
  • learner characteristics and skill acquisition
  • learning to argue
  • learning with simulations
  • longitudinal study
  • mathematics
  • medical education
  • meta-analysis
  • metacognition and regulation
  • metacognition and regulation during inquiry learning
  • mobile learning
  • model-based learning
  • motivation in inquiry learning
  • multi-level design
  • online argumentation
  • performance assessment of inquiry
  • primary education
  • problem-based learning
  • productive failure
  • project-based learning
  • psychology
  • qualities of argumentation and learning
  • quasi-experimental study
  • reasoning
  • resource- and project-based learning
  • scaffolding
  • science
  • scripts and scaffolds of argumentation
  • secondary education
  • social sciences
  • STEM education
  • technologies and new forms of argumentation
  • technology enhanced learning
  • the role of the teacher in inquiry learning
  • visualizations